Bahamas vs Eswatini: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Bahamas
0.0028 ha per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0.0029 ha per person
in 2024
Bahamas rank
12th
Eswatini rank
11th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Bahamas
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0029 ha per person against 0.0028 ha per person in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Bahamas ranks 12th and Eswatini ranks 11th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0076 ha per person | 0.0065 ha per person | 0.0011 ha per person | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 0.0037 ha per person | 0.006 ha per person | 0.0023 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.0015 ha per person | 0.0036 ha per person | 0.0021 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0016 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Bahamas or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0.0029 ha per person against 0.0028 ha per person in Bahamas as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Bahamas and Eswatini?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Bahamas and Eswatini rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Bahamas ranks 12th and Eswatini ranks 11th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.