Belarus vs Sudan: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Belarus
0 ha per person
in 2024
Sudan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Belarus rank
59th
Sudan rank
61st
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Belarus
- Sudan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sudan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.9 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 59th and Sudan ranks 61st of 186 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0004 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Belarus or Sudan?
- Belarus, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Belarus and Sudan?
- 0 ha per person, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Sudan rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Belarus ranks 59th and Sudan ranks 61st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.