Belgium vs Kazakhstan: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Belgium
0 ha per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Belgium rank
86th
Kazakhstan rank
86th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Belgium
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Belgium ranks 86th and Kazakhstan ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Belgium or Kazakhstan?
- Belgium, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Belgium and Kazakhstan?
- 0 ha per person, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Kazakhstan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Kazakhstan rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Belgium ranks 86th and Kazakhstan ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.