Chad vs Colombia: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Chad
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
Colombia
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
Chad rank
51st
Colombia rank
50th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Chad
- Colombia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in Chad, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 51st and Colombia ranks 50th of 186 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0212 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0211 ha per person | Chad |
| 2000s | 0.0045 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0044 ha per person | Chad |
| 2010s | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Chad |
| 2020s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Chad or Colombia?
- Colombia, at 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in Chad as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Chad and Colombia?
- 0 ha per person, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Colombia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chad and Colombia rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Chad ranks 51st and Colombia ranks 50th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.