Chile vs Guatemala: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Chile
0.0006 ha per person
in 2024
Guatemala
0.0005 ha per person
in 2024
Chile rank
24th
Guatemala rank
25th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Chile
- Guatemala
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0006 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 24th and Guatemala ranks 25th of 186 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0023 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0021 ha per person | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.0013 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0012 ha per person | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.0027 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0026 ha per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.004 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0039 ha per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Chile or Guatemala?
- Chile, at 0.0006 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Chile and Guatemala?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Guatemala?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Guatemala rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Chile ranks 24th and Guatemala ranks 25th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.