Chile vs South Sudan: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Chile
0.0006 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0.0005 ha per person
in 2024
Chile rank
24th
South Sudan rank
26th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Chile
- South Sudan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0006 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times South Sudan's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 24th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 186 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.003 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0026 ha per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.004 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0036 ha per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Chile or South Sudan?
- Chile, at 0.0006 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Chile and South Sudan?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Chile and South Sudan rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Chile ranks 24th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.