Croatia vs Nicaragua: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Croatia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Nicaragua
0 ha per person
in 2023
Croatia rank
57th
Nicaragua rank
56th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Croatia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Croatia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 57th and Nicaragua ranks 56th of 186 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Croatia or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Croatia and Nicaragua?
- 0 ha per person, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Nicaragua?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Nicaragua rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Croatia ranks 57th and Nicaragua ranks 56th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.