Egypt vs Sweden: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Egypt
0 ha per person
in 2024
Sweden
0 ha per person
in 2024
Egypt rank
86th
Sweden rank
86th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Egypt
- Sweden
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sweden, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 86th and Sweden ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Egypt or Sweden?
- Egypt, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Egypt and Sweden?
- 0 ha per person, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Sweden rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Egypt ranks 86th and Sweden ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.