Eswatini vs Portugal: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Eswatini
0.0029 ha per person
in 2024
Portugal
0.0029 ha per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
11th
Portugal rank
10th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 0.0029 ha per person against 0.0029 ha per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 11th and Portugal ranks 10th of 186 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0065 ha per person | 0.0015 ha per person | 0.005 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.006 ha per person | 0.0015 ha per person | 0.0045 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.0036 ha per person | 0.0016 ha per person | 0.002 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0016 ha per person | 0.0013 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Eswatini or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 0.0029 ha per person against 0.0029 ha per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Eswatini and Portugal?
- 0 ha per person, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Portugal?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Portugal rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 11th and Portugal ranks 10th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.