Gibraltar vs Mali: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Gibraltar
0 ha per person
in 2024
Mali
0 ha per person
in 2024
Gibraltar rank
86th
Mali rank
86th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Gibraltar
- Mali
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mali, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
Gibraltar ranks 86th and Mali ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.015 ha per person | 0.0144 ha per person | Mali |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | Mali |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Gibraltar or Mali?
- Gibraltar, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mali as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Gibraltar and Mali?
- 0 ha per person, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Mali?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Gibraltar and Mali rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Gibraltar ranks 86th and Mali ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.