Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Gibraltar or Rwanda?

Gibraltar, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Rwanda as of 2024.

What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Gibraltar and Rwanda?

0 ha per person, with Gibraltar ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Rwanda?

35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Gibraltar vs Rwanda: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita

Gibraltar

0 ha per person

in 2024

Rwanda

0 ha per person

in 2024

Gibraltar rank

86th

Rwanda rank

86th

Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time

Gibraltar
Rwanda

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 ha per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gibraltar ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 86th and Rwanda ranks 86th of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Gibraltar averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Gibraltar	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0006 ha per person	0.0001 ha per person	0.0005 ha per person	Gibraltar
2000s	0 ha per person	0 ha per person	0 ha per person	Rwanda
2010s	0 ha per person	0 ha per person	0 ha per person	Rwanda
2020s	0 ha per person	0 ha per person	0 ha per person	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Gibraltar or Rwanda?: Gibraltar, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Gibraltar and Rwanda?: 0 ha per person, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Rwanda?: 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Gibraltar and Rwanda rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?: Gibraltar ranks 86th and Rwanda ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Rwanda: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burned-area-per-capita/gibraltar/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burned-area-per-capita/gibraltar/rwanda/">Gibraltar vs Rwanda: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Unit: ha per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 6,434 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed: 04 October 2026

Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.