Guatemala vs South Sudan: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Guatemala
0.0005 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0.0005 ha per person
in 2024
Guatemala rank
25th
South Sudan rank
26th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Guatemala
- South Sudan
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0.0005 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Guatemala ranks 25th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 186 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Guatemala or South Sudan?
- Guatemala, at 0.0005 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Guatemala and South Sudan?
- 0 ha per person, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and South Sudan rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Guatemala ranks 25th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.