Israel vs Namibia: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Israel
0 ha per person
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Israel rank
86th
Namibia rank
86th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Israel
- Namibia
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 86th and Namibia ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Israel or Namibia?
- Israel, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Israel and Namibia?
- 0 ha per person, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Namibia rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Israel ranks 86th and Namibia ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.