Israel vs Nigeria: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Israel
0 ha per person
in 2024
Nigeria
0 ha per person
in 2024
Israel rank
86th
Nigeria rank
85th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Israel
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Israel, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 86th and Nigeria ranks 85th of 186 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0012 ha per person | 0.0012 ha per person | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Israel or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Israel as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Israel and Nigeria?
- 0 ha per person, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Nigeria?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Nigeria rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Israel ranks 86th and Nigeria ranks 85th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.