Israel vs Uzbekistan: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Israel
0 ha per person
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Israel rank
86th
Uzbekistan rank
86th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Israel
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 86th and Uzbekistan ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Israel or Uzbekistan?
- Israel, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Israel and Uzbekistan?
- 0 ha per person, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Uzbekistan rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Israel ranks 86th and Uzbekistan ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.