Jamaica vs Kazakhstan: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Jamaica
0 ha per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Jamaica rank
86th
Kazakhstan rank
86th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Jamaica
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Jamaica ranks 86th and Kazakhstan ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Jamaica or Kazakhstan?
- Jamaica, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Jamaica and Kazakhstan?
- 0 ha per person, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Jamaica and Kazakhstan rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Jamaica ranks 86th and Kazakhstan ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.