Malawi vs South Sudan: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Malawi
0.0004 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0.0005 ha per person
in 2024
Malawi rank
29th
South Sudan rank
26th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Malawi
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0005 ha per person against 0.0004 ha per person in Malawi, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.3 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 29th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 186 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Malawi or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0005 ha per person against 0.0004 ha per person in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Malawi and South Sudan?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and South Sudan rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Malawi ranks 29th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.