Pakistan vs Uruguay: Other forest — Burned Area, per capita
Pakistan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0 ha per person
in 2024
Pakistan rank
69th
Uruguay rank
68th
Other forest — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Pakistan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Pakistan ranks 69th and Uruguay ranks 68th of 186 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per capita, Pakistan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per capita between Pakistan and Uruguay?
- 0 ha per person, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Uruguay?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and Uruguay rank globally for other forest — burned area, per capita?
- Pakistan ranks 69th and Uruguay ranks 68th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.