Angola vs Malawi: Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Angola
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malawi
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Angola rank
10th
Malawi rank
12th
Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Angola
- Malawi
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Malawi, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malawi ahead.
Angola ranks 10th and Malawi ranks 12th of 183 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Angola |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp, Angola or Malawi?
- Angola, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp between Angola and Malawi?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Malawi?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Malawi rank globally for other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Angola ranks 10th and Malawi ranks 12th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.