Cuba vs Georgia: Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Cuba
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Georgia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cuba rank
41st
Georgia rank
38th
Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Cuba
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Cuba, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.3 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Cuba ranks 41st and Georgia ranks 38th of 183 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Georgia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp, Cuba or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp between Cuba and Georgia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Georgia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and Georgia rank globally for other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 41st and Georgia ranks 38th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.