Iraq vs Namibia: Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Iraq
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Iraq rank
84th
Namibia rank
84th
Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Iraq
- Namibia
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Iraq ranks 84th and Namibia ranks 84th of 183 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp, Iraq or Namibia?
- Iraq, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp between Iraq and Namibia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Iraq and Namibia rank globally for other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Iraq ranks 84th and Namibia ranks 84th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.