Italy vs Lithuania: Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Italy
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Lithuania
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Italy rank
81st
Lithuania rank
84th
Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Italy
- Lithuania
How they compare
Italy currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Lithuania, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lithuania ahead.
Italy ranks 81st and Lithuania ranks 84th of 183 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Italy |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp, Italy or Lithuania?
- Italy, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp between Italy and Lithuania?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Lithuania?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Lithuania rank globally for other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Italy ranks 81st and Lithuania ranks 84th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.