Belgium vs Norway: Other forest — Burned Area — UNFCCC
Belgium
144 ha
in 2011
Norway
363 ha
in 2020
Belgium rank
18th
Norway rank
16th
Other forest — Burned Area — UNFCCC over time
- Belgium
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 363 ha against 144 ha in Belgium, a difference of 219 ha.
That makes Norway's figure about 2.5 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.
Belgium ranks 18th and Norway ranks 16th of 25 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.11 ha | 818.16 ha | 816.05 ha | Norway |
| 2010s | 144 ha | 121.2 ha | 22.8 ha | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area — unfccc, Belgium or Norway?
- Norway, at 363 ha against 144 ha in Belgium as of 2020.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area — unfccc between Belgium and Norway?
- 219 ha, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Norway?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Belgium and Norway rank globally for other forest — burned area — unfccc?
- Belgium ranks 18th and Norway ranks 16th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.