Finland vs Poland: Other forest — Burned Area — UNFCCC
Finland
3,039 ha
in 2020
Poland
4,876 ha
in 2020
Finland rank
12th
Poland rank
11th
Other forest — Burned Area — UNFCCC over time
- Finland
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 4,876 ha against 3,039 ha in Finland, a difference of 1,837 ha.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.6 times Finland's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 12th and Poland ranks 11th of 25 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,069 ha | 10,947 ha | 8,879 ha | Poland |
| 2000s | 1,708 ha | 6,365 ha | 4,658 ha | Poland |
| 2010s | 1,004 ha | 3,044 ha | 2,040 ha | Poland |
| 2020s | 3,039 ha | 4,876 ha | 1,838 ha | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area — unfccc, Finland or Poland?
- Poland, at 4,876 ha against 3,039 ha in Finland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area — unfccc between Finland and Poland?
- 1,837 ha, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Poland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Poland rank globally for other forest — burned area — unfccc?
- Finland ranks 12th and Poland ranks 11th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.