Ireland vs Norway: Other forest — Burned Area — UNFCCC
Ireland
300 ha
in 2020
Norway
363 ha
in 2020
Ireland rank
16th
Norway rank
15th
Other forest — Burned Area — UNFCCC over time
- Ireland
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 363 ha against 300 ha in Ireland, a difference of 63 ha.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Norway ahead.
Ireland ranks 16th and Norway ranks 15th of 24 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 340.48 ha | 626.44 ha | 285.96 ha | Norway |
| 2000s | 432.72 ha | 1,035 ha | 601.93 ha | Norway |
| 2010s | 656.36 ha | 712.8 ha | 56.44 ha | Norway |
| 2020s | 300 ha | 363 ha | 63 ha | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area — unfccc, Ireland or Norway?
- Norway, at 363 ha against 300 ha in Ireland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area — unfccc between Ireland and Norway?
- 63 ha, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Norway?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Ireland and Norway rank globally for other forest — burned area — unfccc?
- Ireland ranks 16th and Norway ranks 15th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.