Ireland vs Sweden: Other forest — Burned Area — UNFCCC
Ireland
300 ha
in 2020
Sweden
1,164 ha
in 2020
Ireland rank
16th
Sweden rank
13th
Other forest — Burned Area — UNFCCC over time
- Ireland
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 1,164 ha against 300 ha in Ireland, a difference of 864 ha.
That makes Sweden's figure about 3.9 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Ireland ranks 16th and Sweden ranks 13th of 24 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 340.48 ha | 2,140 ha | 1,800 ha | Sweden |
| 2000s | 432.72 ha | 4,934 ha | 4,501 ha | Sweden |
| 2010s | 656.36 ha | 5,035 ha | 4,379 ha | Sweden |
| 2020s | 300 ha | 1,164 ha | 864 ha | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area — unfccc, Ireland or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 1,164 ha against 300 ha in Ireland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area — unfccc between Ireland and Sweden?
- 864 ha, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Sweden?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Ireland and Sweden rank globally for other forest — burned area — unfccc?
- Ireland ranks 16th and Sweden ranks 13th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.