China, Hong Kong SAR vs Lesotho: Other forest: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2015
Lesotho
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
90th
Lesotho rank
90th

Other forest: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Lesotho
-2000200400199120072023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Lesotho, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Lesotho ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 90th and Lesotho ranks 90th of 161 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Lesotho Difference Ahead
1990s -10.39 % change on previous year 34.04 % change on previous year 44.42 % change on previous year Lesotho
2000s -80.25 % change on previous year -87.29 % change on previous year 7.04 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), China, Hong Kong SAR or Lesotho?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Lesotho as of 2015.
What is the difference in other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Lesotho?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Lesotho?
10 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Lesotho rank globally for other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 90th and Lesotho ranks 90th of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Lesotho: Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/lesotho/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Lesotho: Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 4,854 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.