Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Other forest: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

Eswatini
142.03 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
122.23 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini rank
17th
Zimbabwe rank
18th

Other forest: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • Eswatini
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600199120072024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 142.03 % change on previous year against 122.23 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 19.8 % change on previous year.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Eswatini ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 161 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 11.23 % change on previous year 3.55 % change on previous year 7.68 % change on previous year Eswatini
2000s -12.66 % change on previous year -5.11 % change on previous year 7.55 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s 67.92 % change on previous year 9.59 % change on previous year 58.33 % change on previous year Eswatini
2020s 69.28 % change on previous year 49.14 % change on previous year 20.14 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Eswatini or Zimbabwe?
Eswatini, at 142.03 % change on previous year against 122.23 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
19.8 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Zimbabwe rank globally for other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Eswatini ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/zimbabwe/">Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 4,854 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.