Gibraltar vs Israel: Other forest: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual
Gibraltar
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Israel
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Gibraltar rank
90th
Israel rank
90th
Other forest: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time
- Gibraltar
- Israel
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Israel, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Gibraltar ranks 90th and Israel ranks 90th of 161 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Gibraltar or Israel?
- Gibraltar, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Israel as of 1999.
- What is the difference in other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Gibraltar and Israel?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Israel?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do Gibraltar and Israel rank globally for other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
- Gibraltar ranks 90th and Israel ranks 90th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.