Afghanistan vs Latvia: Other forest — Burning crop residues
Afghanistan
0 t
in 2024
Latvia
0 t
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
93rd
Latvia rank
93rd
Other forest — Burning crop residues over time
- Afghanistan
- Latvia
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Latvia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 93rd and Latvia ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 583.65 t | 8,374 t | 7,791 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 354.73 t | 26,357 t | 26,003 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 t | 4,240 t | 4,240 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 217.46 t | 217.46 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burning crop residues, Afghanistan or Latvia?
- Afghanistan, at 0 t against 0 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burning crop residues between Afghanistan and Latvia?
- 0 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Latvia rank globally for other forest — burning crop residues?
- Afghanistan ranks 93rd and Latvia ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.