Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Other forest — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
6.17 million t
in 2024
Ethiopia
6.28 million t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
14th
Ethiopia rank
11th

Other forest — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Ethiopia
050.0M100.0M150.0M199020072024

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 6.28 million t against 6.17 million t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 115,950 t.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 14th and Ethiopia ranks 11th of 219 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 31.88 million t 8.75 million t 23.13 million t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 23.81 million t 7.68 million t 16.13 million t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 27.75 million t 4.89 million t 22.86 million t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 21.93 million t 7.68 million t 14.24 million t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other forest — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Ethiopia?
Ethiopia, at 6.28 million t against 6.17 million t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in other forest — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia?
115,950 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia rank globally for other forest — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 14th and Ethiopia ranks 11th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Other forest — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/ethiopia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Other forest — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
272 places, 9,294 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.