Gibraltar vs Mali: Other forest — Burning crop residues
Gibraltar
0 t
in 2024
Mali
0 t
in 2024
Gibraltar rank
93rd
Mali rank
93rd
Other forest — Burning crop residues over time
- Gibraltar
- Mali
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Mali, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
Gibraltar ranks 93rd and Mali ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 833.15 t | 8.27 million t | 8.27 million t | Mali |
| 2000s | 0 t | 541,636 t | 541,636 t | Mali |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burning crop residues, Gibraltar or Mali?
- Gibraltar, at 0 t against 0 t in Mali as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burning crop residues between Gibraltar and Mali?
- 0 t, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Mali?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Gibraltar and Mali rank globally for other forest — burning crop residues?
- Gibraltar ranks 93rd and Mali ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.