Mauritius vs Norway: Other forest — Burning crop residues
Mauritius
0 t
in 2024
Norway
0 t
in 2024
Mauritius rank
93rd
Norway rank
93rd
Other forest — Burning crop residues over time
- Mauritius
- Norway
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Norway, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 93rd and Norway ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 302.48 t | 9,382 t | 9,079 t | Norway |
| 2000s | 0 t | 3,808 t | 3,808 t | Norway |
| 2010s | 0 t | 1,328 t | 1,328 t | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burning crop residues, Mauritius or Norway?
- Mauritius, at 0 t against 0 t in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burning crop residues between Mauritius and Norway?
- 0 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Norway?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Norway rank globally for other forest — burning crop residues?
- Mauritius ranks 93rd and Norway ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.