Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Other forest — Burning crop residues
Mauritius
0 t
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 t
in 2024
Mauritius rank
93rd
Sri Lanka rank
93rd
Other forest — Burning crop residues over time
- Mauritius
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 93rd and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 302.48 t | 15,925 t | 15,622 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0 t | 10,657 t | 10,657 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0 t | 538.67 t | 538.67 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0 t | 215.45 t | 215.45 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burning crop residues, Mauritius or Sri Lanka?
- Mauritius, at 0 t against 0 t in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burning crop residues between Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 0 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Sri Lanka rank globally for other forest — burning crop residues?
- Mauritius ranks 93rd and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.