Namibia vs Turkmenistan: Other forest — Burning crop residues
Namibia
0 t
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 t
in 2024
Namibia rank
93rd
Turkmenistan rank
93rd
Other forest — Burning crop residues over time
- Namibia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 93rd and Turkmenistan ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 89,000 t | 1,243 t | 87,757 t | Namibia |
| 2000s | 47,945 t | 378.88 t | 47,567 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 2,912 t | 0 t | 2,912 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 7,980 t | 0 t | 7,980 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burning crop residues, Namibia or Turkmenistan?
- Namibia, at 0 t against 0 t in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burning crop residues between Namibia and Turkmenistan?
- 0 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Turkmenistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Turkmenistan rank globally for other forest — burning crop residues?
- Namibia ranks 93rd and Turkmenistan ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.