Northern Africa vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burning crop residues

Northern Africa
60,401 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
862,778 t
in 2024
Northern Africa rank
25th
Zimbabwe rank
25th

Other forest — Burning crop residues over time

  • Northern Africa
  • Zimbabwe
020.0M40.0M60.0M199020072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 862,778 t against 60,401 t in Northern Africa, a difference of 802,377 t.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 14.3 times Northern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Northern Africa ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 31 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Northern Africa averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 16.00 million t 1.40 million t 14.61 million t Northern Africa
2000s 5.07 million t 1.10 million t 3.97 million t Northern Africa
2010s 712,079 t 2.01 million t 1.30 million t Zimbabwe
2020s 1.00 million t 512,044 t 490,486 t Northern Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other forest — burning crop residues, Northern Africa or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 862,778 t against 60,401 t in Northern Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in other forest — burning crop residues between Northern Africa and Zimbabwe?
802,377 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Northern Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for other forest — burning crop residues?
Northern Africa ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern Africa vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/northern-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/northern-africa/zimbabwe/">Northern Africa vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
272 places, 9,294 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.