Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Other forest: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square

Bahamas
1.08 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
25th
Zimbabwe rank
27th

Other forest: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square over time

  • Bahamas
  • Zimbabwe
010203040199020062023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 1.08 t per square kilometre against 1 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.08 t per square kilometre.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 12.39 t per square kilometre 3.61 t per square kilometre 8.79 t per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 6.46 t per square kilometre 2.85 t per square kilometre 3.61 t per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 2.85 t per square kilometre 5.2 t per square kilometre 2.35 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.4314 t per square kilometre 1.1 t per square kilometre 0.6656 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Bahamas or Zimbabwe?
Bahamas, at 1.08 t per square kilometre against 1 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
0.08 t per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Zimbabwe rank globally for other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Bahamas ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/">Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 6,245 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.