Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Other forest: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … unit

Mexico
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mexico rank
17th
Zimbabwe rank
14th

Other forest: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … unit over time

  • Mexico
  • Zimbabwe
000000.001199020072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Mexico, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.0 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mexico ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 14th of 183 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Mexico or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Mexico as of 2024.
What is the difference in other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Mexico and Zimbabwe?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Mexico and Zimbabwe rank globally for other forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Mexico ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 14th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/mexico/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/mexico/zimbabwe/">Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 6,212 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Other forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.