Malta vs Namibia: Other forest — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1
Malta
0 kt
in 2024
Namibia
0 kt
in 2024
Malta rank
103rd
Namibia rank
103rd
Other forest — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Malta
- Namibia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Namibia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 103rd and Namibia ranks 103rd of 236 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.5288 kt | 0.5288 kt | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.3217 kt | 0.3217 kt | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0067 kt | 0.0067 kt | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0184 kt | 0.0184 kt | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1, Malta or Namibia?
- Malta, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 between Malta and Namibia?
- 0 kt, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for other forest — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1?
- Malta ranks 103rd and Namibia ranks 103rd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.