Gambia vs Mauritius: Other forest — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Gambia
0 kt per person
in 2024
Mauritius
0 kt per person
in 2024
Gambia rank
86th
Mauritius rank
86th
Other forest — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Gambia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 86th and Mauritius ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — emissions (ch4), per capita, Gambia or Mauritius?
- Gambia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — emissions (ch4), per capita between Gambia and Mauritius?
- 0 kt per person, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Mauritius rank globally for other forest — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Gambia ranks 86th and Mauritius ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.