Italy vs Latvia: Other forest — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP
Italy
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Italy rank
81st
Latvia rank
84th
Other forest — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP over time
- Italy
- Latvia
How they compare
Italy currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Italy ranks 81st and Latvia ranks 84th of 183 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Italy or Latvia?
- Italy, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Italy and Latvia?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Latvia rank globally for other forest — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?
- Italy ranks 81st and Latvia ranks 84th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.