Armenia vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Other forest — Emissions
Armenia
0 kt
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2024
Armenia rank
92nd
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
92nd
Other forest — Emissions over time
- Armenia
- China, Hong Kong SAR
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 92nd and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 92nd of 146 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | China, Hong Kong SAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.05 kt | 5.03 kt | 0.0185 kt | Armenia |
| 2010s | 12.58 kt | 0.8703 kt | 11.71 kt | Armenia |
| 2020s | 24.8 kt | 0 kt | 24.8 kt | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — emissions, Armenia or China, Hong Kong SAR?
- Armenia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — emissions between Armenia and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 0 kt, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for other forest — emissions?
- Armenia ranks 92nd and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 92nd of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.