China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sweden: Other forest — Emissions
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2024
Sweden
0 kt
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
92nd
Sweden rank
92nd
Other forest — Emissions over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Sweden
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Sweden ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 92nd and Sweden ranks 92nd of 146 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.03 kt | 4.13 kt | 0.9007 kt | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | 0.8703 kt | 73.69 kt | 72.82 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Sweden?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Sweden?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Sweden rank globally for other forest — emissions?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 92nd and Sweden ranks 92nd of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.