Latvia vs Mauritius: Other forest — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mauritius
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Latvia rank
90th
Mauritius rank
90th
Other forest — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Latvia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Latvia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Mauritius, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Mauritius ahead.
Latvia ranks 90th and Mauritius ranks 90th of 153 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Latvia or Mauritius?
- Latvia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Latvia and Mauritius?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for other forest — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Latvia ranks 90th and Mauritius ranks 90th of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Other forest — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.