Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Other forest — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Mauritius
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Sri Lanka
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mauritius rank
90th
Sri Lanka rank
90th
Other forest — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Mauritius
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 90th and Sri Lanka ranks 90th of 153 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Mauritius or Sri Lanka?
- Mauritius, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka as of 1999.
- What is the difference in other forest — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do Mauritius and Sri Lanka rank globally for other forest — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Mauritius ranks 90th and Sri Lanka ranks 90th of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Other forest — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.