Chile vs South Sudan: Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Chile
0 kt per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0 kt per person
in 2024
Chile rank
24th
South Sudan rank
26th
Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Chile
- South Sudan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times South Sudan's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 24th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 186 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — emissions (n2o), per capita, Chile or South Sudan?
- Chile, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — emissions (n2o), per capita between Chile and South Sudan?
- 0 kt per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Chile and South Sudan rank globally for other forest — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Chile ranks 24th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.