Ecuador vs South Sudan: Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Ecuador
0 kt per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0 kt per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
27th
South Sudan rank
26th
Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Ecuador
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 27th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 186 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — emissions (n2o), per capita, Ecuador or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — emissions (n2o), per capita between Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 0 kt per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and South Sudan rank globally for other forest — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 27th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.