Iraq vs Kazakhstan: Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Iraq
0 kt per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 kt per person
in 2024
Iraq rank
86th
Kazakhstan rank
86th
Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Iraq
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 86th and Kazakhstan ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — emissions (n2o), per capita, Iraq or Kazakhstan?
- Iraq, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — emissions (n2o), per capita between Iraq and Kazakhstan?
- 0 kt per person, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Iraq and Kazakhstan rank globally for other forest — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Iraq ranks 86th and Kazakhstan ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.