Rwanda vs Uzbekistan: Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Rwanda
0 kt per person
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 kt per person
in 2024
Rwanda rank
86th
Uzbekistan rank
86th
Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Rwanda
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Rwanda ranks 86th and Uzbekistan ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — emissions (n2o), per capita, Rwanda or Uzbekistan?
- Rwanda, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — emissions (n2o), per capita between Rwanda and Uzbekistan?
- 0 kt per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Uzbekistan rank globally for other forest — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Rwanda ranks 86th and Uzbekistan ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.