China vs Congo: Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
China
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Congo
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
China rank
56th
Congo rank
55th
Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time
- China
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.5 times China's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China ahead.
China ranks 56th and Congo ranks 55th of 183 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Congo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp, China or Congo?
- Congo, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp between China and Congo?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Congo?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China and Congo rank globally for other forest — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp?
- China ranks 56th and Congo ranks 55th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.